https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161283 The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the Division Bench's order and restoring the Single Judge's order refusing the interlocutory injunction. The court emphasized that the appellate bench erred in interfering with the trial court's discretion and did not adequately address the prior use by Wander Ltd. or the implications of the Drug Controller's license. The matter was remitted to the High Court for expeditious disposal of the suit, with no orders as to costs. en-us Thu, 26 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161283 The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the Division Bench's order and restoring the Single Judge's order refusing the interlocutory injunction. The court emphasized that the appellate bench erred in interfering with the trial court's discretion and did not adequately address the prior use by Wander Ltd. or the implications of the Drug Controller's license. The matter was remitted to the High Court for expeditious disposal of the suit, with no orders as to costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 26 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161283