https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161283 In a passing off dispute, appellate interference with refusal of temporary injunction is justified only where the trial court's discretion is arbitrary, capricious, perverse, or contrary to settled principles. The plaintiff must show a prima facie case, including prior user and likelihood of deception; mere trade mark registration is insufficient for interlocutory relief. As the defendant's prior user finding remained undisturbed and the plaintiff did not establish grounds to displace the status quo, the appellate court should not have reversed the trial court's refusal of injunction, and the restraint order in favour of the plaintiff was unsustainable. en-us Thu, 26 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161283 In a passing off dispute, appellate interference with refusal of temporary injunction is justified only where the trial court's discretion is arbitrary, capricious, perverse, or contrary to settled principles. The plaintiff must show a prima facie case, including prior user and likelihood of deception; mere trade mark registration is insufficient for interlocutory relief. As the defendant's prior user finding remained undisturbed and the plaintiff did not establish grounds to displace the status quo, the appellate court should not have reversed the trial court's refusal of injunction, and the restraint order in favour of the plaintiff was unsustainable. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 26 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161283