https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161269 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, dismissing the revision applications and affirming that the opposite party-dealer was not liable for tax under the U.P. Trade Tax Act or the Central Sales Tax Act. The Tribunal's findings were supported by relevant material and principles of natural justice, leading the High Court to conclude that there were no grounds for interference with the Tribunal's order. en-us Thu, 12 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Jan 2014 12:43:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161269 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, dismissing the revision applications and affirming that the opposite party-dealer was not liable for tax under the U.P. Trade Tax Act or the Central Sales Tax Act. The Tribunal's findings were supported by relevant material and principles of natural justice, leading the High Court to conclude that there were no grounds for interference with the Tribunal's order. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 12 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161269