<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 566 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242345</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI found that the adjudicating authority&#039;s failure to consider the appellant&#039;s claim for exclusion of statutory levies and charges, despite being based on a statutory rule, constituted a serious flaw. This omission was deemed as an abdication of adjudicating responsibilities, leading to an erroneous adjudication order. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the original order, instructing a fresh consideration with a personal hearing for the appellant. Emphasizing the importance of adhering to relevant rules, the Tribunal remitted the matter for de novo determination, ensuring a fair outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 566 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242345</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI found that the adjudicating authority&#039;s failure to consider the appellant&#039;s claim for exclusion of statutory levies and charges, despite being based on a statutory rule, constituted a serious flaw. This omission was deemed as an abdication of adjudicating responsibilities, leading to an erroneous adjudication order. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the original order, instructing a fresh consideration with a personal hearing for the appellant. Emphasizing the importance of adhering to relevant rules, the Tribunal remitted the matter for de novo determination, ensuring a fair outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>