<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 562 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242341</link>
    <description>Where the impugned tour operator activity was undertaken in Srinagar, the demand was vulnerable because the Finance Act did not apply to Jammu and Kashmir. On the materials placed, the applicant showed a strong prima facie case, and pre-deposit of the dues was waived while recovery of the demanded amount was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 562 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242341</link>
      <description>Where the impugned tour operator activity was undertaken in Srinagar, the demand was vulnerable because the Finance Act did not apply to Jammu and Kashmir. On the materials placed, the applicant showed a strong prima facie case, and pre-deposit of the dues was waived while recovery of the demanded amount was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>