<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 549 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242328</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was successful as the penalty for a wrongful depreciation claim was reinstated. Despite arguments of bonafide intent, lack of evidence to support the claim&#039;s legitimacy led to the penalty being upheld. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty was overturned, emphasizing the importance of accurate particulars in tax filings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:51:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 549 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242328</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was successful as the penalty for a wrongful depreciation claim was reinstated. Despite arguments of bonafide intent, lack of evidence to support the claim&#039;s legitimacy led to the penalty being upheld. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty was overturned, emphasizing the importance of accurate particulars in tax filings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>