<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 534 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242313</link>
    <description>The Tribunal disposed of the appeal, emphasizing adherence to principles of natural justice and proper procedures in passing prohibitory orders affecting Customs House Agents (CHAs). The appellant&#039;s challenge against the prohibition to operate as a CHA under Regulation 21 of CHALR 2004 was deemed not maintainable. The Tribunal underscored the importance of following natural justice principles and giving CHAs an opportunity to present their case before imposing prohibitory orders, even in cases requiring immediate action. The order passed by CC Kandla was upheld as an interim measure under relevant regulations, with no interference deemed necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:49:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 534 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242313</link>
      <description>The Tribunal disposed of the appeal, emphasizing adherence to principles of natural justice and proper procedures in passing prohibitory orders affecting Customs House Agents (CHAs). The appellant&#039;s challenge against the prohibition to operate as a CHA under Regulation 21 of CHALR 2004 was deemed not maintainable. The Tribunal underscored the importance of following natural justice principles and giving CHAs an opportunity to present their case before imposing prohibitory orders, even in cases requiring immediate action. The order passed by CC Kandla was upheld as an interim measure under relevant regulations, with no interference deemed necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>