<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 530 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242309</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Order-in-Appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai. The tribunal upheld the transaction value declared by the respondent for imported goods, stating that the value cannot be enhanced based on supplier quotations. Trade discounts are acceptable in international trade, and there was no evidence of undervaluation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:49:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 530 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242309</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Order-in-Appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai. The tribunal upheld the transaction value declared by the respondent for imported goods, stating that the value cannot be enhanced based on supplier quotations. Trade discounts are acceptable in international trade, and there was no evidence of undervaluation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>