<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 524 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242303</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant regarding the eligibility of CENVAT credit on certain items, imposition of penalty and interest, validity of demand beyond the limitation period, and credit availed on invoices not in the appellant&#039;s name. The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit a specified amount within a timeframe, waived predeposit for remaining dues, and granted a stay against recovery during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 13:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 524 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242303</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant regarding the eligibility of CENVAT credit on certain items, imposition of penalty and interest, validity of demand beyond the limitation period, and credit availed on invoices not in the appellant&#039;s name. The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit a specified amount within a timeframe, waived predeposit for remaining dues, and granted a stay against recovery during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>