<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 518 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242297</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that M/s. Kalptaru Alloys Pvt. Ltd. availed ineligible cenvat credit without receiving the inputs. The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit an additional Rs.10 lakhs within eight weeks, in addition to the Rs.15 lakhs already deposited. Pending compliance, applications for waiving the pre-deposit of the remaining amounts were allowed, and recovery was stayed until the appeal&#039;s disposal. Compliance was to be reported before the Deputy Registrar by a specified date for further orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:48:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 518 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242297</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that M/s. Kalptaru Alloys Pvt. Ltd. availed ineligible cenvat credit without receiving the inputs. The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit an additional Rs.10 lakhs within eight weeks, in addition to the Rs.15 lakhs already deposited. Pending compliance, applications for waiving the pre-deposit of the remaining amounts were allowed, and recovery was stayed until the appeal&#039;s disposal. Compliance was to be reported before the Deputy Registrar by a specified date for further orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>