https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242296 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD denied further adjournments in a stay petition due to the appellant's advocate's unavailability. The tribunal found the appellant's admission statement, revealing improper goods clearance, insufficient to warrant a complete penalty waiver. A specific deposit was ordered within a set timeframe, with compliance reporting for potential waiver of the remaining amount. Recovery was stayed pending appeal resolution. The judgment addressed adjournments, admission statements, penalty imposition, compliance reporting, and pre-deposit waiver intricacies. en-us Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:48:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242296 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD denied further adjournments in a stay petition due to the appellant's advocate's unavailability. The tribunal found the appellant's admission statement, revealing improper goods clearance, insufficient to warrant a complete penalty waiver. A specific deposit was ordered within a set timeframe, with compliance reporting for potential waiver of the remaining amount. Recovery was stayed pending appeal resolution. The judgment addressed adjournments, admission statements, penalty imposition, compliance reporting, and pre-deposit waiver intricacies. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242296