https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161267 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal in part, directing the framing of charges under Sections 120-B, 161, 165, and 420 of the IPC, and Section 5(1) read with Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, while upholding the discharge on charges of extortion under Section 384, IPC. The court requested the Chief Justice of the High Court to nominate another judge to take up the trial from the stage at which it was left by the previous judge. en-us Thu, 17 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161267 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal in part, directing the framing of charges under Sections 120-B, 161, 165, and 420 of the IPC, and Section 5(1) read with Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, while upholding the discharge on charges of extortion under Section 384, IPC. The court requested the Chief Justice of the High Court to nominate another judge to take up the trial from the stage at which it was left by the previous judge. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161267