<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 484 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161257</link>
    <description>The court quashed the interim order passed by the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (STAT) in a specific case and allowed the writ petition. It held that the STAT lacked jurisdiction to grant the interim order and that the appeal itself was not maintainable. The court also rejected the request for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court, stating that no question of law of general importance arose in this case. The writ petition was allowed without any order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:11:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 484 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161257</link>
      <description>The court quashed the interim order passed by the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (STAT) in a specific case and allowed the writ petition. It held that the STAT lacked jurisdiction to grant the interim order and that the appeal itself was not maintainable. The court also rejected the request for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court, stating that no question of law of general importance arose in this case. The writ petition was allowed without any order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>