<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 508 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161256</link>
    <description>Delayed refund of tax attracts statutory simple interest where the refund is not made within three months from the relevant refund order, including an order passed by the Tribunal and received by the competent authority. The liability to refund arose on the Tribunal&#039;s final order, not on the filing of a separate refund application, so rule-based arguments tying interest to that application were rejected. Because the refund vouchers were issued after expiry and were dishonoured, the refund was not effected within the statutory period. The assessee was therefore entitled to interest from the end of the three-month period until a valid refund voucher was delivered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:11:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 508 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161256</link>
      <description>Delayed refund of tax attracts statutory simple interest where the refund is not made within three months from the relevant refund order, including an order passed by the Tribunal and received by the competent authority. The liability to refund arose on the Tribunal&#039;s final order, not on the filing of a separate refund application, so rule-based arguments tying interest to that application were rejected. Because the refund vouchers were issued after expiry and were dishonoured, the refund was not effected within the statutory period. The assessee was therefore entitled to interest from the end of the three-month period until a valid refund voucher was delivered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>