<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 524 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161248</link>
    <description>Security for tax registration under Section 21(2-B) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 can be demanded only when necessary for proper realisation of tax, and Section 21(2-C) requires a hearing and limits the quantum. A demand based on proving the genuineness of business transactions was outside that statutory basis, and the authority had failed to apply the governing provisions. The imposed security requirement, including the cash deposit demand in a nationalised bank, was arbitrary and excessive. The demand for security deposit was therefore held not legally sustainable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:25:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 524 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161248</link>
      <description>Security for tax registration under Section 21(2-B) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 can be demanded only when necessary for proper realisation of tax, and Section 21(2-C) requires a hearing and limits the quantum. A demand based on proving the genuineness of business transactions was outside that statutory basis, and the authority had failed to apply the governing provisions. The imposed security requirement, including the cash deposit demand in a nationalised bank, was arbitrary and excessive. The demand for security deposit was therefore held not legally sustainable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>