<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 600 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161245</link>
    <description>The power to extend the assessment period under section 42 read with rule 37A must rest on valid grounds supported by reasons showing extraordinary circumstances or supervening causes beyond the assessing authority&#039;s default. A mere assertion that the inquiry or assessment is unlikely to be completed within the prescribed time is insufficient to justify extension. On that basis, the extension order was held unsustainable and was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 600 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161245</link>
      <description>The power to extend the assessment period under section 42 read with rule 37A must rest on valid grounds supported by reasons showing extraordinary circumstances or supervening causes beyond the assessing authority&#039;s default. A mere assertion that the inquiry or assessment is unlikely to be completed within the prescribed time is insufficient to justify extension. On that basis, the extension order was held unsustainable and was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>