<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 548 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161244</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax&#039;s order seeking fresh demands for assessment years 1984-85 to 1990-91. The Court found discrepancies in the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s proceedings, emphasizing the need for proper initiation of proceedings under section 23(4)(a) and clarity on non-produced documents. Despite the availability of an appeal before the Commissioner, the Court intervened due to errors in the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s order, highlighting the importance of fair adjudication and application of mind. Concerns regarding bias led the Court to suggest considering a different officer for the proceedings to uphold natural justice and impartiality.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 16:48:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 548 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161244</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax&#039;s order seeking fresh demands for assessment years 1984-85 to 1990-91. The Court found discrepancies in the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s proceedings, emphasizing the need for proper initiation of proceedings under section 23(4)(a) and clarity on non-produced documents. Despite the availability of an appeal before the Commissioner, the Court intervened due to errors in the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s order, highlighting the importance of fair adjudication and application of mind. Concerns regarding bias led the Court to suggest considering a different officer for the proceedings to uphold natural justice and impartiality.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>