<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 514 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242293</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a transformer manufacturer and repairer, in a service tax dispute. The issue revolved around whether the cost of goods used in repair activities should be included in service tax liability. The Tribunal found that if the buyer bears the cost of goods during maintenance, it constitutes a sale of goods, not part of services. Citing legal precedents, including a Supreme Court case and previous Tribunal decisions, the Tribunal held that the value of goods used in repairs should be excluded from service costs. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between goods and services in repair contracts for service tax assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 514 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242293</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a transformer manufacturer and repairer, in a service tax dispute. The issue revolved around whether the cost of goods used in repair activities should be included in service tax liability. The Tribunal found that if the buyer bears the cost of goods during maintenance, it constitutes a sale of goods, not part of services. Citing legal precedents, including a Supreme Court case and previous Tribunal decisions, the Tribunal held that the value of goods used in repairs should be excluded from service costs. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between goods and services in repair contracts for service tax assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>