<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 510 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242289</link>
    <description>The High Court criticized CESTAT for dismissing an appeal due to non-compliance with a stay order while a related appeal was pending before the High Court. The Court emphasized the importance of avoiding multiple proceedings and granted a stay on CESTAT&#039;s order, allowing the appellant to amend the memo of appeal within 10 days. The High Court also granted an ad-interim stay on the Commissioner&#039;s order regarding service tax, scheduling a hearing for 18 July 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2014 05:33:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 510 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242289</link>
      <description>The High Court criticized CESTAT for dismissing an appeal due to non-compliance with a stay order while a related appeal was pending before the High Court. The Court emphasized the importance of avoiding multiple proceedings and granted a stay on CESTAT&#039;s order, allowing the appellant to amend the memo of appeal within 10 days. The High Court also granted an ad-interim stay on the Commissioner&#039;s order regarding service tax, scheduling a hearing for 18 July 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>