<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 487 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242266</link>
    <description>The Ld. CIT(A) deleted various additions made by the AO, including those related to Royalty, Provision for warranty, Airfare of Technicians, Entry tax, and Software expenses. The Ld. CIT(A) based the deletions on previous decisions by the Tribunal, ruling that the payments and provisions were revenue expenditures and allowable as such. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, as they were consistent with the Tribunal&#039;s earlier rulings in the assessee&#039;s favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2014 05:31:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 487 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242266</link>
      <description>The Ld. CIT(A) deleted various additions made by the AO, including those related to Royalty, Provision for warranty, Airfare of Technicians, Entry tax, and Software expenses. The Ld. CIT(A) based the deletions on previous decisions by the Tribunal, ruling that the payments and provisions were revenue expenditures and allowable as such. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, as they were consistent with the Tribunal&#039;s earlier rulings in the assessee&#039;s favor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>