https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242258 The Tribunal upheld the Stay Order requiring a predeposit of Rs.2,50,00,000 within 8 weeks, rejecting the modification application based on the classification of goods as CFL with choke. The Tribunal interpreted Notification No.138/2002-Cus to determine the rates of duty for CFL with and without choke. The application of anti-dumping duty was affirmed for specific CFL types integrating the choke within the lamp. The Tribunal dismissed the financial hardship claim due to lack of evidence but extended the compliance period by six weeks, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the predeposit requirement. en-us Wed, 04 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Jan 2014 05:29:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242258 The Tribunal upheld the Stay Order requiring a predeposit of Rs.2,50,00,000 within 8 weeks, rejecting the modification application based on the classification of goods as CFL with choke. The Tribunal interpreted Notification No.138/2002-Cus to determine the rates of duty for CFL with and without choke. The application of anti-dumping duty was affirmed for specific CFL types integrating the choke within the lamp. The Tribunal dismissed the financial hardship claim due to lack of evidence but extended the compliance period by six weeks, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the predeposit requirement. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 04 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242258