https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242258 The dispute concerned whether the applicant could obtain modification of a stay order that required predeposit and granted waiver of the balance demand. The Tribunal noted that the issue depended on the classification and nature of the imported CFLs, which had to be examined on catalogue, specifications and other factual material at final hearing. It also observed that the relevant notification provided different duty treatment for CFLs with choke and without choke, and that the earlier stay order had already considered the matter and fixed the predeposit. The modification request was rejected on the material available for interim consideration, and the predeposit direction remained operative, with time extended for compliance. en-us Wed, 04 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Jan 2014 05:29:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242258 The dispute concerned whether the applicant could obtain modification of a stay order that required predeposit and granted waiver of the balance demand. The Tribunal noted that the issue depended on the classification and nature of the imported CFLs, which had to be examined on catalogue, specifications and other factual material at final hearing. It also observed that the relevant notification provided different duty treatment for CFLs with choke and without choke, and that the earlier stay order had already considered the matter and fixed the predeposit. The modification request was rejected on the material available for interim consideration, and the predeposit direction remained operative, with time extended for compliance. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 04 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242258