<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 478 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242257</link>
    <description>Declared transaction value under the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988 cannot be rejected unless a legally sustainable doubt is supported by proper enquiry and reliable contemporaneous evidence; on that basis, reassessment was unsustainable. A broad description in the import documents did not itself establish general misdeclaration, so valuation-linked confiscation and penalty could not survive, but undeclared goods remained liable to confiscation and duty consequences. Non-declaration of MRP for CFLs could not be upheld without a finding that the goods were pre-packaged commodities intended for sale to ultimate consumers, so that limited issue required de novo adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2014 05:29:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 478 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242257</link>
      <description>Declared transaction value under the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988 cannot be rejected unless a legally sustainable doubt is supported by proper enquiry and reliable contemporaneous evidence; on that basis, reassessment was unsustainable. A broad description in the import documents did not itself establish general misdeclaration, so valuation-linked confiscation and penalty could not survive, but undeclared goods remained liable to confiscation and duty consequences. Non-declaration of MRP for CFLs could not be upheld without a finding that the goods were pre-packaged commodities intended for sale to ultimate consumers, so that limited issue required de novo adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>