https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161240 The Court rejected the contentions raised by the petitioners regarding delay in dealing with detenus' representations, validity of detention orders while detenus were in custody, failure to supply crucial documents, and validity of the declaration under Section 9(1) of the Act. The Court upheld the decisions of the lower court, finding no merit in the petitioners' arguments, and dismissed the special leave petitions and writ petitions. en-us Fri, 14 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Aug 2021 12:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161240 The Court rejected the contentions raised by the petitioners regarding delay in dealing with detenus' representations, validity of detention orders while detenus were in custody, failure to supply crucial documents, and validity of the declaration under Section 9(1) of the Act. The Court upheld the decisions of the lower court, finding no merit in the petitioners' arguments, and dismissed the special leave petitions and writ petitions. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 14 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161240