<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (10) TMI 199 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161239</link>
    <description>The Court allowed all three Writ Petitions, emphasizing that the representation dated July 27, 1980, was not considered, and there was an undue delay in furnishing the necessary documents. The Court upheld the interpretation that &#039;grounds&#039; under Article 22(5) include all factual material and inferences, and any failure to comply with these requirements renders the detention illegal. The petitions were allowed, and the detenus were ordered to be released.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2014 09:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (10) TMI 199 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161239</link>
      <description>The Court allowed all three Writ Petitions, emphasizing that the representation dated July 27, 1980, was not considered, and there was an undue delay in furnishing the necessary documents. The Court upheld the interpretation that &#039;grounds&#039; under Article 22(5) include all factual material and inferences, and any failure to comply with these requirements renders the detention illegal. The petitions were allowed, and the detenus were ordered to be released.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>