https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161235 Constructive res judicata does not bar a later habeas corpus petition raising fresh grounds against preventive detention. The detention was unlawful because the detenu was not supplied all documents and materials relied on in forming the grounds, denying an effective opportunity to represent against detention. It was also vitiated because the Central Government did not dispose of the detenu's representation with expedition, contrary to Article 22(5). Service of the grounds only in English, without a written translation in a language understood by the detenu, likewise failed the constitutional requirement of effective communication. en-us Mon, 15 Dec 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Aug 2014 09:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161235 Constructive res judicata does not bar a later habeas corpus petition raising fresh grounds against preventive detention. The detention was unlawful because the detenu was not supplied all documents and materials relied on in forming the grounds, denying an effective opportunity to represent against detention. It was also vitiated because the Central Government did not dispose of the detenu's representation with expedition, contrary to Article 22(5). Service of the grounds only in English, without a written translation in a language understood by the detenu, likewise failed the constitutional requirement of effective communication. Case-Laws FEMA Mon, 15 Dec 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161235