https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242237 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners in a case challenging Section 2(36) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act. While the section allows for sums charged for services related to goods sold to be included in the sale price, the court found that installation and transportation charges, clearly delineated in invoices and paid separately as service tax, were not part of the sale price. As a result, the reassessment orders for multiple assessment years were quashed, and the court directed accordingly, holding that the charges in question were not subject to VAT. en-us Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Jul 2014 15:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242237 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners in a case challenging Section 2(36) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act. While the section allows for sums charged for services related to goods sold to be included in the sale price, the court found that installation and transportation charges, clearly delineated in invoices and paid separately as service tax, were not part of the sale price. As a result, the reassessment orders for multiple assessment years were quashed, and the court directed accordingly, holding that the charges in question were not subject to VAT. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242237