<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 444 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242223</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming the restriction on deductions related to rural branches under section 36(1)(viia) of the Income-tax Act. However, the issue of netting provisions made for bad and doubtful debts was remanded for fresh examination to ascertain the actual provision created by the assessee. The decision was pronounced on May 8, 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 444 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242223</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming the restriction on deductions related to rural branches under section 36(1)(viia) of the Income-tax Act. However, the issue of netting provisions made for bad and doubtful debts was remanded for fresh examination to ascertain the actual provision created by the assessee. The decision was pronounced on May 8, 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>