https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242217 The Tribunal modified its earlier order, remitting the issues of difference in depreciation rates and objection to a comparable company back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration in light of the Quark Systems P. Ltd. decision. The non-quantification of the amount of risk assumed by the assessee was upheld. The assessee's appeal was partly allowed, and the miscellaneous application was partly allowed. The order was pronounced on April 8, 2013. en-us Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Mar 2017 17:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242217 The Tribunal modified its earlier order, remitting the issues of difference in depreciation rates and objection to a comparable company back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration in light of the Quark Systems P. Ltd. decision. The non-quantification of the amount of risk assumed by the assessee was upheld. The assessee's appeal was partly allowed, and the miscellaneous application was partly allowed. The order was pronounced on April 8, 2013. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242217