<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 435 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242214</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, considering the genuine hardship faced by the assessee. It acknowledged the High Courts&#039; decisions quashing the amendment to section 80HHC and admitted the appeal for further review of the deduction issue. The Tribunal remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer for verification and decision, partially allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 10:35:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 435 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242214</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, considering the genuine hardship faced by the assessee. It acknowledged the High Courts&#039; decisions quashing the amendment to section 80HHC and admitted the appeal for further review of the deduction issue. The Tribunal remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer for verification and decision, partially allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>