<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 429 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242208</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of with the direction to the adjudicating authority to examine the refund claim for compliance with the requirements under Section 27(1A) of the Customs Act concerning unjust enrichment and then decide the claim accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2015 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 429 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242208</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of with the direction to the adjudicating authority to examine the refund claim for compliance with the requirements under Section 27(1A) of the Customs Act concerning unjust enrichment and then decide the claim accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>