https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242204 The Tribunal upheld the stay order requiring the appellant to deposit a specific amount and provide a bank guarantee for their appeals, despite the appellant's financial difficulties. The High Court had reduced the initial deposit amount based on cash deposit and a bank guarantee, but the Tribunal found the directions reasonable and denied the appellant's request for modification. The appellant was granted an extension of six weeks to comply with the deposit and guarantee obligations, with a compliance check scheduled for a later date. The judgment balanced financial compliance with considerations of justice and precedent. en-us Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Jan 2014 10:34:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242204 The Tribunal upheld the stay order requiring the appellant to deposit a specific amount and provide a bank guarantee for their appeals, despite the appellant's financial difficulties. The High Court had reduced the initial deposit amount based on cash deposit and a bank guarantee, but the Tribunal found the directions reasonable and denied the appellant's request for modification. The appellant was granted an extension of six weeks to comply with the deposit and guarantee obligations, with a compliance check scheduled for a later date. The judgment balanced financial compliance with considerations of justice and precedent. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242204