https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161230 The Court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned orders, and directed the respondent to entertain the refund applications of the petitioners and decide them on their merits in accordance with the law. The Court held that the limitation period should start from the month of October 1994 when the petitioners acquired knowledge of the Tribunal's order, following the principle established in Raja Harish Chandra Raj Singh v. Deputy Land Acquisition Officer. The judgment emphasized the importance of fair play and natural justice in determining the limitation period for seeking remedies against orders affecting individuals' rights. en-us Tue, 13 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jan 2014 18:50:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161230 The Court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned orders, and directed the respondent to entertain the refund applications of the petitioners and decide them on their merits in accordance with the law. The Court held that the limitation period should start from the month of October 1994 when the petitioners acquired knowledge of the Tribunal's order, following the principle established in Raja Harish Chandra Raj Singh v. Deputy Land Acquisition Officer. The judgment emphasized the importance of fair play and natural justice in determining the limitation period for seeking remedies against orders affecting individuals' rights. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 13 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161230