<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 483 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161228</link>
    <description>Under section 20(3), the limitation period is satisfied when the revisional authority passes the final revisional order within four years; later service of that order is only a ministerial act and does not invalidate an order made in time. The Court distinguished authority relied on by the assessee because that case involved unexplained delay, whereas the service delay here was explained. The revisional order was therefore held to be within limitation, the challenge failed, and no relief was available to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 18:40:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 483 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161228</link>
      <description>Under section 20(3), the limitation period is satisfied when the revisional authority passes the final revisional order within four years; later service of that order is only a ministerial act and does not invalidate an order made in time. The Court distinguished authority relied on by the assessee because that case involved unexplained delay, whereas the service delay here was explained. The revisional order was therefore held to be within limitation, the challenge failed, and no relief was available to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>