https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161228 The Court upheld the validity of the order served beyond four years from the original order date, emphasizing the importance of timely service. Despite the delay in service, the order was passed within the statutory limit, distinguishing it from previous cases where delays rendered orders invalid. The Court clarified that the four-year period under the Act includes the entire revision process, affirming that the order must be passed within the limit. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, with no costs awarded to the appellant. en-us Tue, 09 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jan 2014 18:40:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161228 The Court upheld the validity of the order served beyond four years from the original order date, emphasizing the importance of timely service. Despite the delay in service, the order was passed within the statutory limit, distinguishing it from previous cases where delays rendered orders invalid. The Court clarified that the four-year period under the Act includes the entire revision process, affirming that the order must be passed within the limit. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, with no costs awarded to the appellant. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 09 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161228