<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 603 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161212</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal Rajasthan Taxation Tribunal allowed the revision application in a case involving penalties imposed under section 22-A(7) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954. The Tribunal ruled that form ST-18 was not required for the transportation of a laundry machine, as it did not fall under the notification category. It emphasized the necessity of issuing notice to the owner before imposing penalties for tax evasion and determined that the petitioner had not evaded tax. The Tribunal set aside the penalty, directing the refund with interest, and clarified that penalties could not be solely based on the driver&#039;s conduct, highlighting compliance obligations under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 17:33:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 603 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161212</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal Rajasthan Taxation Tribunal allowed the revision application in a case involving penalties imposed under section 22-A(7) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954. The Tribunal ruled that form ST-18 was not required for the transportation of a laundry machine, as it did not fall under the notification category. It emphasized the necessity of issuing notice to the owner before imposing penalties for tax evasion and determined that the petitioner had not evaded tax. The Tribunal set aside the penalty, directing the refund with interest, and clarified that penalties could not be solely based on the driver&#039;s conduct, highlighting compliance obligations under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>