<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 674 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161211</link>
    <description>Ex parte assessment remained valid because notices were served, no authorised representative established a valid adjournment request, and no denial of reasonable hearing was shown. Assessment under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act was competent where it relied on enquiry information known to and undisputed by the dealer, satisfying the statutory precondition. Bank-account attachment through garnishee proceedings was lawful after demand became recoverable; a contemplated or subsequently filed appeal or stay application did not automatically bar recovery without a statutory prohibition. Attached accounts were to be released upon deposit of the outstanding balance as security, with early disposal of the stay application required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 17:27:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 674 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161211</link>
      <description>Ex parte assessment remained valid because notices were served, no authorised representative established a valid adjournment request, and no denial of reasonable hearing was shown. Assessment under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act was competent where it relied on enquiry information known to and undisputed by the dealer, satisfying the statutory precondition. Bank-account attachment through garnishee proceedings was lawful after demand became recoverable; a contemplated or subsequently filed appeal or stay application did not automatically bar recovery without a statutory prohibition. Attached accounts were to be released upon deposit of the outstanding balance as security, with early disposal of the stay application required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>