<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 673 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161208</link>
    <description>A stay granted in first appeal, once made subject to and shown to have complied with conditions, continued to operate during the pendency of the appeal before the Tribunal under section 19(2-C) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957. Reading the provision in categorical terms, the Court treated the stay order as enuring to the petitioner&#039;s benefit until the Tribunal disposed of the appeal and directed the department not to take recovery steps meanwhile.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 17:20:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 673 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161208</link>
      <description>A stay granted in first appeal, once made subject to and shown to have complied with conditions, continued to operate during the pendency of the appeal before the Tribunal under section 19(2-C) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957. Reading the provision in categorical terms, the Court treated the stay order as enuring to the petitioner&#039;s benefit until the Tribunal disposed of the appeal and directed the department not to take recovery steps meanwhile.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>