<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 678 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161207</link>
    <description>The court set aside the order directing fresh assessment based on prevailing market rates and disallowed the shortage claimed by the assessee. The levy of interest on the additional tax demand was also overturned. The assessing officer was instructed to conduct a fresh assessment on the shortage. The petition was partially allowed with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 17:16:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 678 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161207</link>
      <description>The court set aside the order directing fresh assessment based on prevailing market rates and disallowed the shortage claimed by the assessee. The levy of interest on the additional tax demand was also overturned. The assessing officer was instructed to conduct a fresh assessment on the shortage. The petition was partially allowed with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>