<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 512 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161203</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the best judgment assessments and demand notices, ruling in favor of the petitioner. It held that the product in question qualified as edible oil under the relevant notifications, leading to the conclusion that no tax, interest, or penalty was applicable. The Tribunal emphasized procedural fairness and jurisdictional issues in its decision, ultimately allowing the original applications without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 17:00:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 512 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161203</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the best judgment assessments and demand notices, ruling in favor of the petitioner. It held that the product in question qualified as edible oil under the relevant notifications, leading to the conclusion that no tax, interest, or penalty was applicable. The Tribunal emphasized procedural fairness and jurisdictional issues in its decision, ultimately allowing the original applications without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>