<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 416 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161194</link>
    <description>The Court held that the dealer collecting tendu leaves was not a manufacturer under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, overturning the Sales Tax Tribunal&#039;s decision. The State was deemed the manufacturer based on the collection agreements with the Forest department, absolving the dealer from sales tax liability. The revision petition was granted, and the Tribunal was instructed to align its decision with the Court&#039;s ruling, emphasizing the State&#039;s role as the manufacturer in the sale of tendu leaves.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 15:54:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 416 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161194</link>
      <description>The Court held that the dealer collecting tendu leaves was not a manufacturer under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, overturning the Sales Tax Tribunal&#039;s decision. The State was deemed the manufacturer based on the collection agreements with the Forest department, absolving the dealer from sales tax liability. The revision petition was granted, and the Tribunal was instructed to align its decision with the Court&#039;s ruling, emphasizing the State&#039;s role as the manufacturer in the sale of tendu leaves.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>