<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 491 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161178</link>
    <description>Concessional tax under section 3-G of the U.P. Trade Tax Act applies when the prescribed declaration in form III-D is furnished and bona fide accepted by the selling dealer. The proviso excluding goods purchased for resale or for use in manufacture or packing did not justify denying the concession on these facts. If the declaration is false, liability shifts to the purchasing dealer under section 3-B unless collusion between the buying and selling dealers is shown. As no collusion or deliberate acceptance of a false certificate was established, the selling dealer remained protected and was not liable to assessment at the normal rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 18:04:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 491 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161178</link>
      <description>Concessional tax under section 3-G of the U.P. Trade Tax Act applies when the prescribed declaration in form III-D is furnished and bona fide accepted by the selling dealer. The proviso excluding goods purchased for resale or for use in manufacture or packing did not justify denying the concession on these facts. If the declaration is false, liability shifts to the purchasing dealer under section 3-B unless collusion between the buying and selling dealers is shown. As no collusion or deliberate acceptance of a false certificate was established, the selling dealer remained protected and was not liable to assessment at the normal rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>