<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 506 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161177</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the applications for revision, stating that Central excise duty reimbursed by the government and not paid by the purchaser should not be considered for CST levy. The assessment orders including Central excise duty in turnover for CST were set aside, with no interest or penalty applicable in this scenario.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 18:01:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 506 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161177</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the applications for revision, stating that Central excise duty reimbursed by the government and not paid by the purchaser should not be considered for CST levy. The assessment orders including Central excise duty in turnover for CST were set aside, with no interest or penalty applicable in this scenario.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>