<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 490 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161173</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the sale of cement consignments between two firms in Rajasthan constituted the first point of sale in the series of successive sales, as per the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act. The tax paid at this initial stage was deemed correct, and no further tax liability was imposed at subsequent sale points. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the non-petitioner firm, upholding the Revenue Board&#039;s decision and dismissing the revision petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 17:17:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 490 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161173</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the sale of cement consignments between two firms in Rajasthan constituted the first point of sale in the series of successive sales, as per the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act. The tax paid at this initial stage was deemed correct, and no further tax liability was imposed at subsequent sale points. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the non-petitioner firm, upholding the Revenue Board&#039;s decision and dismissing the revision petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>