<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 386 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161170</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow an appeal filed beyond the specified period under Section 31-A of the TNGST Act, emphasizing the importance of complying with statutory timelines while recognizing the provision for condonation of delay. The Court also affirmed the requirement for proof of payment of admitted tax with the appeal, noting that the payment and filing occurred on separate dates but were in compliance with the law. The judgment highlighted the interplay between procedural requirements, factual circumstances, and authorities&#039; discretion in determining the entertainability of appeals in tax cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 17:00:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 386 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161170</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow an appeal filed beyond the specified period under Section 31-A of the TNGST Act, emphasizing the importance of complying with statutory timelines while recognizing the provision for condonation of delay. The Court also affirmed the requirement for proof of payment of admitted tax with the appeal, noting that the payment and filing occurred on separate dates but were in compliance with the law. The judgment highlighted the interplay between procedural requirements, factual circumstances, and authorities&#039; discretion in determining the entertainability of appeals in tax cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>