<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 594 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161164</link>
    <description>Revisional jurisdiction under section 41 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act is confined to questions of law and does not extend to reappreciation of pure findings of fact. On the materials considered by the assessment and appellate authorities, there was no reliable basis to hold that the assessee was carrying on the business of manufacturing or selling bricks during the relevant years. The record pointed instead to employment elsewhere, absence of a supporting licence, and inconclusive evidence from the alleged loan and local enquiry. The Tribunal&#039;s cancellation of the assessment order was therefore left undisturbed, and the revision was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:17:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 594 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161164</link>
      <description>Revisional jurisdiction under section 41 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act is confined to questions of law and does not extend to reappreciation of pure findings of fact. On the materials considered by the assessment and appellate authorities, there was no reliable basis to hold that the assessee was carrying on the business of manufacturing or selling bricks during the relevant years. The record pointed instead to employment elsewhere, absence of a supporting licence, and inconclusive evidence from the alleged loan and local enquiry. The Tribunal&#039;s cancellation of the assessment order was therefore left undisturbed, and the revision was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>