https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242192 Where a fiscal statute provides an efficacious statutory appeal, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 should ordinarily not be used to re-examine assessment orders involving disputed questions of fact. The court held that objections based on absence of reasons and lack of jurisdiction could be raised before the appellate authority, which was competent to consider them, so the writ appeals were not maintainable and the parties were left to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. en-us Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jan 2014 09:46:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242192 Where a fiscal statute provides an efficacious statutory appeal, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 should ordinarily not be used to re-examine assessment orders involving disputed questions of fact. The court held that objections based on absence of reasons and lack of jurisdiction could be raised before the appellate authority, which was competent to consider them, so the writ appeals were not maintainable and the parties were left to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242192