https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242188 The Tribunal confirmed a demand for consulting engineer services under Section 65 of the Finance Act, citing precedent. However, penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 were set aside for a State Government organization due to a reasonable cause provision in Section 80 of the Finance Act, as the organization believed it was fulfilling statutory duties. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant, ruling out penalties for the Government Undertaking. en-us Fri, 25 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jan 2014 09:46:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242188 The Tribunal confirmed a demand for consulting engineer services under Section 65 of the Finance Act, citing precedent. However, penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 were set aside for a State Government organization due to a reasonable cause provision in Section 80 of the Finance Act, as the organization believed it was fulfilling statutory duties. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant, ruling out penalties for the Government Undertaking. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 25 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242188