<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 403 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242181</link>
    <description>The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit of service tax, interest, and penalties for the applicant in a case involving technical testing &amp;amp; analysis services received from a foreign provider. The Tribunal found that since the services were provided outside India and the testing report was received by the applicant&#039;s Head Office in France, the applicant was not liable to pay service tax as per the Taxation of Services Rules, 2006. Emphasizing the importance of the service location in determining tax liability, the Tribunal granted a stay on recovery during the appeal process, citing a previous favorable Tribunal decision as precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 09:45:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 403 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242181</link>
      <description>The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit of service tax, interest, and penalties for the applicant in a case involving technical testing &amp;amp; analysis services received from a foreign provider. The Tribunal found that since the services were provided outside India and the testing report was received by the applicant&#039;s Head Office in France, the applicant was not liable to pay service tax as per the Taxation of Services Rules, 2006. Emphasizing the importance of the service location in determining tax liability, the Tribunal granted a stay on recovery during the appeal process, citing a previous favorable Tribunal decision as precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>