<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 402 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242180</link>
    <description>The appellate authority allowed the appeal in a case concerning the liability of service tax on the construction of a complex service. Relying on the Board&#039;s Circular and judicial precedents, it determined that the assessee was not liable to remit tax for the period before the insertion of the explanation to Section 65(106)(zzzh) of the Act. The appeal was dismissed, and cross objections were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 09:45:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 402 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242180</link>
      <description>The appellate authority allowed the appeal in a case concerning the liability of service tax on the construction of a complex service. Relying on the Board&#039;s Circular and judicial precedents, it determined that the assessee was not liable to remit tax for the period before the insertion of the explanation to Section 65(106)(zzzh) of the Act. The appeal was dismissed, and cross objections were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>