<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 400 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242178</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s order, holding that the entire sale amount should be considered accrued income under the mercantile system of accounting. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-examine the transactions and ensure assessability of the sale consideration as the sale agreement was still valid. The appeal of the Revenue was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 12th December, 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 400 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242178</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s order, holding that the entire sale amount should be considered accrued income under the mercantile system of accounting. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-examine the transactions and ensure assessability of the sale consideration as the sale agreement was still valid. The appeal of the Revenue was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 12th December, 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>