<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 399 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242177</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the CIT (A) and Tribunal&#039;s decision. The additions made by the Assessing Officer were partly allowed based on market rates and disallowed for lack of proof of transaction genuineness. The judgment emphasized the significance of thorough evidence examination in tax matters to establish transaction genuineness and assess additions accurately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 09:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 399 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242177</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the CIT (A) and Tribunal&#039;s decision. The additions made by the Assessing Officer were partly allowed based on market rates and disallowed for lack of proof of transaction genuineness. The judgment emphasized the significance of thorough evidence examination in tax matters to establish transaction genuineness and assess additions accurately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>