<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 395 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242173</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remanded the case for a fresh assessment. The AO/TPO was directed to consider the composite functions of the AE, conduct a comprehensive transfer pricing study, and determine the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) of the raw material purchase price, including all relevant costs. Emphasizing the need for a detailed examination, the Tribunal instructed a thorough review of whether the reimbursement of finance costs was at Arm&#039;s Length, taking into account the appellant&#039;s argument on the AE&#039;s composite functions. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the AO/TPO was required to issue a reasoned order following principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 395 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242173</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remanded the case for a fresh assessment. The AO/TPO was directed to consider the composite functions of the AE, conduct a comprehensive transfer pricing study, and determine the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) of the raw material purchase price, including all relevant costs. Emphasizing the need for a detailed examination, the Tribunal instructed a thorough review of whether the reimbursement of finance costs was at Arm&#039;s Length, taking into account the appellant&#039;s argument on the AE&#039;s composite functions. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the AO/TPO was required to issue a reasoned order following principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>